MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, better to read.
Practical experience, contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as likely to find employment…..
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will alter their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Lots of people think that it’s easier to learn something in a group as opposed to individually. help writing college essay Do you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has many advantages
Elements of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
Some people think that children have to do organised activities inside their spare time although some genuinely believe that children should really be free to do what they need to do within their free time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it might be unfair to this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to purchase
-furthermore studies show that the mind operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.
Lots of people say that globalisation and also the growing amount of multinational companies have a negative influence on the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer. As to the extent would you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your position.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENT interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…
Scientists think that so that you can protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy inside their daily lives. However, a lot of people never have changed the real way they live. Why do you think many individuals have never taken action that is individual? What could be done to cause them to become do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy regarding the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could possibly be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……
Some genuinely believe that is the responsibility of individuals to deal with the surroundings. Others say this is the government that will be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should take care of the surroundings because:
Our company is the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should care for the environmental surroundings because:
They have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians of the country, which means collectively they have been guardians of the earth… not true the truth is
Both should really be doing more!
In lots of countries small shops and town centers are going out of business, because individuals have a tendency to drive to your large out-of-town stores. This leads to a rise in car use, and it also implies that people without cars have limited usage of out-of-town stores. Do you think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?